Saturday January 23rd, 2021
Salaama Market
Youtube jobs


Friday June 26, 2020 - 22:48:49 in Maqaallo by Wariye Tiriko
  • Visits: 421
  • (Rating 0.0/5 Stars) Total Votes: 0
  • 0 0
  • Share via Social Media



    Share on Twitter Share on facebook Share on Digg Share on Stumbleupon Share on Delicious Share on Google Plus

After a bloody civil war, in January 1991 Siad Barr’s Twenty-one-years regime was overthrown in Somlia. The Northern Half of Somalia Declared its Independence as the
Republic of Somaliland in May 1991. This outline summarizes the main arguments for the propriety of such a declaration and its recognition as an independent state under international law. A thorough study is under preparation.
The State of Somalia, which came into existence in 1960, resulted from a merger between two independent states, the Northern Somaliland, a British Protectorate and Southern
Somalia, an Italian Trust Territory. General Siad Barre took over the administration in a coup in 1969 and led the country through a calamitous period of chaos and repression until
he was deposed by the combined might of several liberation movements such as the Somali National Movement (SNM), which had been waging its battle against his regime since
1981. After his overthrow, the south has been a Habbesian nightmare of interclan fighting whereas the independent Somaliland remains the most stable region in the Horn of Africa.

II. Validity of Independence in Historical Perspective Somali society is comprised of various clans such as Digil, Gabooye, Rahanweyn, Dir ,
Isaaq, Hawiye, and Darood, and the dynamics of interaction between them determines the
distribution of political power in Somlia.
1 The Legal Regime of State and Sovereignty The primary issue is the extent to which the assertion of independence is a valid
manifestation of sovereignty over territory and thus forms a legal basis for the formation of a state under international law. A survey of the applicable law reveals that the issue can be
broken down into the question of the nature of Somaliland’s sovereign rights before and after the act of Union of 1960 and the extent to which this will be dispositive of the viability
of the Union.
2 Sovereignty Under the Treaties of 1884 and the Act of Union of 1960

Britain signed formal treaties with the Somali Clans in 1884. These treaties were specifically intended to ensure the maintenance of the Independence of the Somali clans and did not cede any territory to Britain. Further, the treaties were also of a provisional character. The nature of the treaties leave no doubt at all
that the Somali clans retained a large measure of sovereignty. The capacity to conclude treaties is itself an attribute of international personality. Old international law may have considered such treaties as not international, but the contemporary standards exhibited by the World Court in the Western Sahara case in
1975 reject such views. As a result, the Somali Clans existed as international persons. The two territories were independent countries with no links between them. There was no unifying force

from within. On the contrary, two external factors served to bring about this precipitate union. The first was the proposal by the British Foreign Secretary Mr. Beven in 1946 to create a " Great Somalia”. The
second was the cession of the Haud and Ogaden to Ethiopia by Britain in 1954. Both served as stimulants of national identity. When the union was signed there were a number of legal loose ends. Since both the
North and South were Independent countries, they could unite only by an international treaty as in the case of the Germanys. Such a treaty was never signed. The Somaliland " North” passed a " union law” which did not have any legal validity in south and the constitutional requirements regarding the election
of the President were never completed. Conscious of such legal loopholes, the National Assembly attempted to remedy the situation by passing a retroactive " union” law in January 1961. The absence of
the legal basis for the union is clear and convincing. Furthermore, the North "Somaliland” decisively rejected the draft constitution in a referendum evidencing a permanent rift between north and south.

III-Arguments for Independence under Contemporary International law

1-Violation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms It has always been an accepted rule that oppression, including the deprivation of basic rights such as right
to life, justifies secession. Hugo Grotius mentions that a ruler who shown himself to be the enemy of the people can be deposed and vittles emphasizes that the primary duty of the ruler is to safeguard the welfare
of the citizens and once he/she violates that cardinal rule, he can be deposed. In International law, human
rights are embodies in various treaties such as the International Bill of Rights and are also acknowledged to be rules of jus cogent. Accordingly, there is a right to secede from a state, if the political establishment
engages in such gross and grave human rights violations including genocide. This finds support among many jurists. The test to determine the extent of deprivation of human rights and the legitimacy of
secession is whether a group is being targeted due to its ethnic, cultural of other unique characteristic.
The regime of General Siad Barre " Afweyne” practiced genocidal attacks on the Northern Clans, especially Isaaq. The bombing and shelling of two cities in the North Hargeis and Burao alone killed
150,000 and another 3,000,000 fled to Ethiopia. African Watch reports that inhuman practices were committed on woman and children. Most of the people killed or displaced were Isaaq. The government
forces also looted everything and laid over a million land mines in the North " Somaliland”. Several U.S. government documents including the State Department’s Human Rights Reports attest to the massive violations of human rights such as rights to life and habeas corpus. Under these circumstances the SNM

and the people in the North " Somaliland” had a legal right under international law to at in their self-


Article One of the International Bill of Rights refers to the right to self-determination, as does the

U.N.Charter in Article 1 and 55. The principal questions here are however, whether the right to self-
determination is applicable in Somalia and if it is, whether it will entitle Somaliland to claim

independence. There are sound reasons why the right to self-determination should be conceded to
Somaliland. First, one of the reasons behind Somaliland’s assertion of Independence is the
incompatibility between northern and southern regions. The incompatibility arises from distinct colonial
experiences, which contribute, to a unique identity. Where the reason for self-determination claims lay in
historical experiences that are grounded in colonialism, there is no reason to deny the right to the people
who wish to exercise it. Second, when the assertion of self-determination does not result in changes in
international boundaries and does not pose a threat to inter-state peace, it ought not to be denied to

achieve the short-term goal of doctrinal uniformity. Somaliland has expressly stated that it accepts the
boundaries of the British protectorate in 1960. Third, when the assertion of self-determination is more
conducive to inter-state peace, its validity is strengthened manifold. It is to be noted that Somaliland has
the potential of solving longstanding regional disputes with Ethiopia, Kenya and Djibouti, due to its
acceptance of colonial borders and close ties with Ethiopia. Finally, legal right of self-determination arise
upon the abuse of the political principle of self-determination. In this connection two related issues have
to be remembered. First, North " Somaliland” had overwhelmingly rejected the unified constitution in a
referendum. Second, the U.N. practice of conducting plebiscites prior to desalinization, as in the case of
British Togo land. Under these circumstances, right to self-determination appears to be applicable to
Somaliland. The exercise of such a right should also enable it to claim its independence.

IV.The Arguments for Recognition

1. The legal nature of recognition
Old International law settled questions of title by the tool of recognition. Theories such as " declaratory”
and " constitutive” were used to debate about the nature and function of recognition. However, in
contemporary international law, recognition alone is not dispositive in determining the legal status of
states. Other norms of a humanizing character have entered the process of making states. To the extent
however, that recognition enables a people to internationalize their claims, it is useful.
A head count of all authorities shows that the declaratory view prevails, that recognition only confirms
the fact of existence of a state. It is not practical politics to refuse to recognize a state if it possesses
attributes of statehood. The attributes of statehood as laid down in the Montevideo convention are a
government, territory, defined population and a capacity to enter into international relations. It is evident
that Somaliland possesses all the attributes of statehood. Its distinct people occupy their traditional
territory and the government has effective control over the population. Under these circumstances, the
recognition of Somaliland is an international imperative.
2. Conformity with international law
As indicated above, Somaliland has renounced territorial claims on other countries that the earlier
Somalia had subsumed under its banner of " Greater Somalia ". It has accepted the colonial borders. As
is well known, Somalia irredentism was a major source of instability on the Horn of Africa and its
removal paves the way for peace stability and prosperity in the region. Furthermore, the acceptance of
colonial borders is in accordance with the AU policy. Fears of balkanization as a result of the recognition
of Somaliland are unfounded since no new border is being created as in fact, for the first time colonial
borders troubled borders are those of Somaliland. Lastly, the International community is under an
obligation to recognize because of the obligation to protect and promote human rights under Articles 55
and 56 of the U.N. charter. Only international attention can assist the fledgling state to stand on its own

The Birth of Somaliland is an inevitable result of a distinct colonial experience. It is also the result of
extreme economic exploitation and human suffering. The irredentist policies of Somalia also contributed
to the alienation of the northern population, which never acceded to the union in the first place. While the
past cannot be undone, the international community has a rare opportunity to bring peace and prosperity
to the Horn. By a single act of recognition, it can end the sad sage of
human suffering, enhance the prospects for peace in the region by

putting an end to the Greater Somalia concept, and enable the
people of Somaliland to reclaim their future.

Halkan Ka Daawo:Hees Cusub Oo Uu Sameeyey Abwaanka Caanka Ah Ee Abdimalik
Halkan Ka Daawo Beelaha Axmed Cali iyo Daahir Cali ee Adan Madoobe oo Kalsoonidi Kala Noqday Suldaan Barkhad Iyo Caaqilka Faahiye Xassan ee Adan Madoobe..
Top 10 Hotels of Somalia
Halkan Ka Daawo: Barnaamijkeeni Aqoon Kororsi; Inako Maanta Diirada Ku Saarayna Tobanka Qof ee Aduunka Ugu Hantida Badan Sanadkan 2020
Halkan Ka Daawo Barnaamij Ku Saabsan 10Ka Dal ee Dunida Ugu Yar
Halkan Ka Daawo Barnaamijki Aqoon Kororsi 10 Dal ee Dunida Ugu Weyn Top 10
Halkan Ka Daawo:Barnaamijka Ciida iyo Fanaan Qaasim Macruuf
DAAWO: Beesha Sanbuur Bari Oo Waayelkeda Waxgaradkeda Iyo Guurtidu Si Adag Uga Hadlaya Nin Beeshaas Kasoo Jeeday Oo Ceelafweyn Lagu Dillay Iyaga oo Sheegay Inay U Fadhiyan In La Keeno Gacan Ku Dhiig Lihii
Barnaamijka Qaasin Macruuf Iyo Qisooyinka Heesaha